1. Demand curves faced by individual firms in a competitive market are thought to be perfectly elastic while the demand curve faced by a monopolist is much steeper. a. Why do individual firms in a competitive market face a perfectly elastic demand curve? b. Why do monopolists face a downward sloping demand curve? c. Compare the MR curves for a competitive firm and a monopolist

A). The demand curve looked by the flawlessly serious firms are splendidly versatile this is a result of the items selling in the ideal rivalry. The items are indistinguishable so no firm has power over the market cost, in the event that one firm builds the cost of the item the purchasers will quickly move to the result of different firms on the grounds that the items are indistinguishable. No firm has the motivator lessen the cost of their item. So the interest bend would be a level straight line corresponding to the X pivot, this demonstrates the interest is splendidly versatile. A cost increment will bring the amount requested to zero.  

B). The monopolists is just the single vendor in the market, so he can charge any value he needs, yet the amount requested will be relied on the value he charges. For instance in the event that he charges a significant expense the amount demanded will be very less and the other way around. So the monopolist is capable sell more at lower costs just, the descending inclining request bend shows the negative connection between the cost and the amount requested.  

C). In the ideal rivalry there is consummately flexible interest so the MR curve is likewise the interest curve of the firm. For the monopolist the MR curve lies underneath the interest curve, as the costs go bring down the MR decreases.

you can put this in your 11 sentence summary

" most of the money would be invested in innovation, economic convergence."

anjan should should report alteast 5000 on the first apyment and 10,000 each year

explanation: