subject
Business, 16.04.2020 21:18 sophoyak

Which of the following offers the best reason why restaurants are not considered to be perfectly competitive firms? Group of answer choices Restaurants have significant liability costs that perfectly competitive firms do not have; for example, customers may sue if they suffer from food poisoning. Restaurants compete in small market areas - neighborhoods and cities - rather than in regional or national markets. Therefore, restaurants are not small relative to their market size. Restaurants usually have entry barriers in the form of zoning restrictions and health regulations. Restaurants do not sell identical products.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00, 0318929
How does the plaintiff, mrs. wood, try to implicate the gun manufacturer ( who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 12:20, mxrvin4977
In terms of precent, beer has more alcohol than whiskey true or false
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 13:00, Killakyle4744
Amajor advantage of case studies is
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00, lovecats12
Rosie and her brother michael decided recently to purchase an rv together. they both want to use the rv to take their families camping. the price of the rv was $10,000. since michael expects to use the rv 60% of the time and rosie 40% of the time, michael contributed $6,000 and rosie contributed $4,000. their ownership percentage equals their contribution percentage. which type of property titling should they use to reflect their ownership interest?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following offers the best reason why restaurants are not considered to be perfectly com...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 09.04.2020 17:24