subject
Business, 16.04.2020 02:54 daya88

Consider the following situations for Shocker: a. On November 28, 2018, Shocker receives a $4,050 payment from a customer for services to be rendered evenly over the next three months. Deferred Revenue is credited. b. On December 1, 2018, the company pays a local radio station $2,610 for 30 radio ads that were to be aired, 10 per month, throughout December, January, and February. Prepaid Advertising is debited. c. Employee salaries for the month of December totaling $7,700 will be paid on January 7, 2016. d. On August 31, 2018, Shocker borrows $67,000 from a local bank. A note is signed with principal and 9% interest to be paid on August 31, 2019. Required: Indicate by how much the assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity in the December 31, 2018, balance sheet is higher or lower if the adjustment is not recorded. (If none of the categories apply for a particular item, leave the cell blank.)

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 17:30, SkyMelvin
What do you think: would it be more profitable to own 200 shares of penny’s pickles or 1 share of exxon? why do you think that?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:50, JewelzSkullz
Which three of the following expenses can student aid recover? -tuition -television -school supplies -parties and socializing -boarding/housing
Answers: 2
image
Business, 23.06.2019 07:00, jimenagl
Witch design elements is used to organize used to organize the text in orderly fashion?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Consider the following situations for Shocker: a. On November 28, 2018, Shocker receives a $4,050 pa...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 16.10.2021 03:00
Konu
Mathematics, 16.10.2021 03:00