subject
Business, 14.04.2020 20:00 raylener5841

Econ Suppose that the United States can make 15 cars or 20 bottles of wine with one year's worth of labor. France can make 10 cars or 18 bottles of wine with one year's worth of labor. From these numbers, we can conclude that Select one: a. the United States has a comparative advantage in the production of cars. b. France has a comparative advantage in the production of wine. c. the United States has an absolute advantage in the production of cars. d. All of the above are correct.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:40, Josias13
In early january, burger mania acquired 100% of the common stock of the crispy taco restaurant chain. the purchase price allocation included the following items: $4 million, patent; $3 million, trademark considered to have an indefinite useful life; and $5 million, goodwill. burger mania's policy is to amortize intangible assets with finite useful lives using the straight-line method, no residual value, and a five-year service life. what is the total amount of amortization expense that would appear in burger mania's income statement for the first year ended december 31 related to these items?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:40, nelly88
If kroger had whole foods’ number of days’ sales in inventory, how much additional cash flow would have been generated from the smaller inventory relative to its actual average inventory position? round interim calculations to one decimal place and your final answer to the nearest million.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 12:20, ohgeezy
Consider 8.5 percent swiss franc/u. s. dollar dual-currency bonds that pay $666.67 at maturity per sf1,000 of par value. it sells at par. what is the implicit sf/$ exchange rate at maturity? will the investor be better or worse off at maturity if the actual sf/$ exchange rate is sf1.35/$1.00
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30, badgirl2005
Suppose you win a small lottery and have the choice of two ways to be paid: you can accept the money in a lump sum or in a series of payments over time. if you pick the lump sum, you get $2,950 today. if you pick payments over time, you get three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. 1) at an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 2) at an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 3) years after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. by wild coincidence, she has just won another lottery with the same payout schemes. she must make a quick decision about whether to collect her money under the lump sum or the payments over time. what is the best advice to give your friend? a) the lump sum is always better. b) the payments over time are always better. c) it will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. d) none of these answers is good advice.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Econ Suppose that the United States can make 15 cars or 20 bottles of wine with one year's worth of...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 07.03.2021 23:30
Konu
Mathematics, 07.03.2021 23:30
Konu
Mathematics, 07.03.2021 23:30