Dec. 13 Accepted a $15,000, 45-day, 7% note in granting Miranda Lee a time extension on her past-due account receivable. 31 Prepared an adjusting entry to record the accrued interest on the Lee note. Jan. 27 Received Lee's payment for principal and interest on the note dated December 13. Mar. 3 Accepted a $9,000, 10%, 90-day note in granting a time extension on the past-due account receivable of Tomas Company. 17 Accepted a $7,000, 30-day, 8% note in granting H. Cheng a time extension on his past-due account receivable. Apr. 16 H. Cheng dishonored his note. May 1 Wrote off the H. Cheng account against the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. June 1 Received the Tomas payment for principal and interest on the note dated March 3.

Marine corps leaders use coaching to scrutinize their subordinates to identify proficiency and conduct marking ranges.

Salge inc. bases its manufacturing overhead budget on budgeted direct labor-hours. the variable overhead rate is $8.10 per direct labor-hour. the company's budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is $74,730 per month, which includes depreciation of $20,670. all other fixed manufacturing overhead costs represent current cash flows. the direct labor budget indicates that 5,300 direct labor-hours will be required in september. the company recomputes its predetermined overhead rate every month. the predetermined overhead rate for september should be:

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.