subject
Business, 31.03.2020 02:05 BustD0wnAnt

Magine your company cheated on their earnings statement. The company's accounting firm doesn't say anything. You go into their office wanting an explanation. The CPA calmly says, "Oh, I lied when we signed off on the report." Your reply, "But you can't lie - it is your DUTY to tell the truth." You want the CPA to follow which ethical theory?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 20:30, danthehero56
Northington, inc. is preparing the company's statement of cash flows for the fiscal year just ended. using the following information, determine the amount of cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method: net income$182,000gain on the sale of equipment12,300proceeds from the sale of equipment92,300depreciation expense—equipment50,000payment of bonds at maturity100,000purchase of land200,000issuance of common stock300,000increase in merchandise inventory35,400decrease in accounts receivable28,800increase in accounts payable23,700payment of cash dividends32,000 $189,400.$332,200.$236,800.$261,400 .$186,800.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 02:50, dreyes439
Grey company holds an overdue note receivable of $800,000 plus recorded accrued interest of $64,000. the effective interest rate is 8%. as the result of a court-imposed settlement on december 31, year 3, grey agreed to the following restructuring arrangement: reduced the principal obligation to $600,000.forgave the $64,000 accrued interest. extended the maturity date to december 31, year 5.annual interest of $40,000 is to be paid to grey on december 31, year 4 and year 5. the present value of the interest and principal payments to be received by grey company discounted for two years at 8% is $585,734. grey does not elect the fair value option for reporting the debt modification. on december 31, year 3, grey would recognize a valuation allowance for impaired loans of
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00, judali
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 23:40, synite
Robert is a district manager who oversees several store managers in a national chain of restaurants. robert reports directly to the vice president of stores and marketing, a member of top management. robert is a middle manager. t/f
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Magine your company cheated on their earnings statement. The company's accounting firm doesn't say a...

Questions in other subjects: