subject
Business, 27.03.2020 02:11 andeaGonzllezz

Swedish professors Malin Bolin and Annika Ha?renstam wondered if companies today are more bureaucratic (hierarchical, centralized, and formal) or more post-bureaucratic (flat, decentralized, and flexible). They studied 90 companies and found that many had characteristics of both models. For example, 53% of companies had low levels of centralization (a post-bureaucratic characteristic) although the majority of companies (63%) also had some degree of project organization (a bureaucratic characteristic).Bolin and Ha?renstam suggested that their findings were important because they contradict one of the most famous contingency theories ever developed. In 1961, research by Burns and Stalker showed that successful organizations in stable environments were likely to have a rigid, hierarchical structure (a bureaucracy similar to the one advocated by classical management theories). Burns and Stalker also found that successful organizations in turbulent environments were likely to have a more flexible structure (a post-bureaucracy similar to the one advocated by learning organization theorists). Today, because companies today operate in turbulent environments with stiff competition and a great deal of change, you might expect them to have a post-bureaucratic structure. However, Bolin and Ha?renstam showed that this is not necessarily true. Bolin and Ha?renstam proposed that differences in organizational structure might be related to the type of industry in which the organization operated. Their results showed significant differences in organizational design between companies in seven of eight industries. For example, manufacturing companies had low specialization of work (a post-bureaucratic characteristic) but high use of performance control (a bureaucratic characteristic). In contrast, customer service had high levels of specialization and centralization (bureaucratic characteristics) but also high individual responsibility and low soft control systems (post-bureaucratic characteristics).The contingency in Burns and Stalker’s research was the:a) environmentb) individual organizationc) type of industryWhich of the following presents a critical problem when trying to compare Bolin and Ha?renstam’s research results with those of Burns and Stalker?a) Bolin and Ha?renstam did not measure organizational effectiveness. b) All of the organizations in the study were operating in the same industry. c) More companies had bureaucratic than post-bureaucratic features. d) All of the organizations in the study had both bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic features.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 13:00, mustachegirl311
Match the tasks with the professionals who would complete them. civil engineer, logging equipment manager and energy auditor
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00, jonzyjones3114
Bond x is noncallable and has 20 years to maturity, a 7% annual coupon, and a $1,000 par value. your required return on bond x is 10%; if you buy it, you plan to hold it for 5 years. you (and the market) have expectations that in 5 years, the yield to maturity on a 15-year bond with similar risk will be 9.5%. how much should you be willing to pay for bond x today? (hint: you will need to know how much the bond will be worth at the end of 5 years.) do not round intermediate calculations. round your answer to the nearest cent.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 02:00, johnkings140
Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30, jeieiejej
Zapper has beginning equity of $257,000, net income of $51,000, dividends of $40,000 and investments by stockholders of $6,000. its ending equity is
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Swedish professors Malin Bolin and Annika Ha?renstam wondered if companies today are more bureaucrat...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 30.11.2020 04:20