Seamus O’Malley is rightfully worried about governance (i. e., making sure that the enterprise architectural standards are adopted by all BUs). Both he and Jane are wary of forced compliance because such measures lead to "architecture police." What governance procedures could they put in place that would win "hearts and minds"; that is, BU architects would comply with the enterprise architecture standards because they believe in them—not because they are forced to comply with them?

The governance procedures that can be built include:

From the information given, it was stated that Seamus is wary of forced compliance because such measures lead to "architecture police.

Therefore, the governance procedures such as the evaluation of performances, defining roles and responsibilities, etc are appropriate in this situation.

Learn more about governance on:

link

The governance procedures which they could they put in place that would win "hearts and minds" include:

Based on the given question, we can see that Seamus O'Malley is worried about the governance which he has to do and he has to make sure that the architectural standards which are employed are standard and quality oriented.

With this in mind, we can see that it would put the hearts of people at ease if there are proper structures put in place and the whole system is transparent so that it would avoid forced compliance.

Read more about architecture standards here:

link

e would be the answer