subject
Business, 18.03.2020 23:31 abelxoconda

When Blake Mycoskie started TOMS, he took the concept of to a new level. With its well-known "one for one" shoe giving program, TOMS social causes are directly related to the firm's expertise of selling shoes.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 23:00, lolo8787
The five steps to financial success a. five money myths b. five foundations
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 00:40, pleasehelp5334me2
Oliver queen buys 100 shares of stock in green arrow archery corporation, a publicly traded company with which he is not affiliated as a director, officer, or employee. he then sells his 100 shares to john diggle. the sec sues oliver because he didn't register the sale of stock to john. who wins? oliver, because the sale falls into the nonissuer exemption oliver, because the sale falls into the private placement exemption the sec, because the transaction is not exempt from registration the sec, because even exempt transactions must be registered with the sec
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 12:00, Adones7621
The "ideal" business, according to richard buskirk of the university of southern california: has many diverse employees. has a few, carefully selected employees. has many homogeneous employees. is a "one-man show".
Answers: 2
image
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30, Geo777
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i. e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i. e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
When Blake Mycoskie started TOMS, he took the concept of to a new level. With its well-known "one f...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 01.11.2019 02:31