In Peyton v. Quality Motors, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in the same state is deciding Rikki v. Street Deals, Inc., a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to. a. order the minor to cancel the contract. b. disregard the Peyton case. c. require the minor to fulfill the contract. d. allow the minor to cancel the contract.

Answer i believe the answer is a theme;

Combining the emissions released by fossil fuel burning and  the carbon released via land use change, we get a total of 8.7 gt. since the problem states that the oceans "take up" or sequester  2.4 gt carbon  per year, we subtract that value from 8.7 gt, leaving us with 6.3 gt of carbon. since the problem states that 3.4 gt carbon dioxide emissions end up in the atmosphere, the "missing sink" of carbon takes up 2.9 gt, a value we got by subtracting the 3.4 gt amount recorded from the 6.3 gt carbon left available after the oceans sequester the carbon dioxide. 

The first step to solve this is to move the constant to the right side of the expression and change its sign3x > 3 - 2.4subtract the numbers on the right side of the expression3x > 0.6lastly,, divide both sides of the inequality by 3 to get your final answer.x > 0.2this means that the correct answer to your question is x > 0.2.let me know if you have any further questions: )

12 months (apex answer)