Suppose that jack, hal, and sophia enter into an agreement in regards to the sale of the restaurant. the contract includes the non-competition agreement. a few months later, jack decides that he will sell the frozen food in violation of non-competition agreement, unless if hal and sophia agree to pay him an extra $100,000. hal and sophia agree, since they do not want to fight. six months later, however, they still have not paid and jack sues. what is the result?
a. hal and sophia would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration.
b. hal and sophia would win, since jack already had a prior existing legal duty to not compete with them.
c. jack would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration.
d. jack would win since hal and sophia agreed to pay the extra $100,000.

match each type of restriction with one of its effects.

a. land-use laws

b. labor laws

c. banking regulations

a. controlled development of towns and cities

b. protection of young workers

c. greater financial stability

anyone below or above ambitious can tell you. so crowns mean brainliest. getting brainliest means your answer needs a good explanation and the person asking the question can understand your answer easily. so say there's a multiple choice question. you don't just want to say your answer is a, hope it . provide evidence and reasoning so that they know that that is the correct answer. a good explanation should have evidence, good reasoning, and your opinion on why you picked that. you don't want to look up their question on the internet and see if you can answer it. pick questions that you 100% know the answer to, so than that way you can provide a better explanation.

best of luck,

the divergent