Evan, a shareholder, owned 20% of Yorker's stock for 200 days and 25% of Yorker's stock for the remaining 165 days of the year (not a leap year). Using the required per-day allocation method, Evan's share of the S corporation's ordinary income of $60,000 (rounded to the nearest dollar) is:A. $15,000. B. $18,000. C. $13,356.D. $6,781. E. $6,575.

C. $13,356

Explanation:

Evan, a shareholder, owned 20% of Yorker's stock for 200 days and 25% of Yorker's stock for the remaining 165 days of the year (not a leap year).

Using the required per-day allocation method, Evan's share of the S corporation's ordinary income of $60,000 (rounded to the nearest dollar) is:

0.2 x 60,000 x (200 / 365) + 0.25 x 60,000 x (165/365) = $13,356.16

ok this has nothing to do with business

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.