Contrast the differences between a stock dividend and a stock split. Imagine that you are a stockholder in a company. Determine whether you would prefer to see the company that you researched declare a 100% stock dividend or declare a two-for-one split. Provide support for your answer with one real-world example of your preference.

The thing that matters is generally one of bookkeeping. On account of a split, the firm basically expands the quantity of offers and at the same time lessens the standard or expressed worth per share. On account of a stock profit, there must be an exchange from held income to capital stock. For most firms, a 100% stock profit and a 2-for-1 split achieve the very same thing; thus, financial specialists may pick possibly one (Brigham and Ehrhardt 2014). At the point when stock parts happen the offer cost will go down as needs be with the expectation that extra speculators will currently have the assets to obtain an enthusiasm for the organization. At the point when stock cost is too high it won't pull in specific financial specialists. I have no inclination in the organization I examined proclaiming a 100% stock profit or a 2-for-1 split since they are achieving something very similar for the organization. Since I'm approached to pick I would pick a 2-for-1 split.  

Real life example is of the organization Macy's Inc.  

On May 20 2009, the Macy's, Inc. top managerial staff endorsed a 2-for-1 split of Macy's, Inc. normal stock. The split is organized as a 100% stock profit that was payable June 25, 2009 to investors of record on May 20, 2009. Because of the stock split, every investor would get one extra portion of basic stock for each portion of normal stock claimed as of the end of business on the record date. A 100% stock profit is a typical method to actualize a two-for-one stock split. On the installment date, June 25, 2009, every investor got one extra portion of stock for each offer possessed as of the end of business on the record date, May 20, 2009.  

I would pick a 2-for-1 split in light of the fact that the speculator will have twice the same number of offers as the person in question had on the end of business on the record date, at a large portion of the market cost per share. For instance:  

In the event that a financial specialist claims 100 portions of FD as of the record date and the market cost is $74.00/share, that speculator's all out worth is $7,400.00. After the split, the speculator will have an aggregate of 200 portions of stock, yet the market cost will be $37.00/share. The speculator's all out venture an incentive in FD continues as before at $7,400.00 until the stock value goes up or down.

Explanation:

a

b

b

a

c

b

d

d

none of these are correct, as they are all sources of american law

a

answer$22,000 ;