subject
Business, 19.02.2020 01:03 peggycab4201

The following appeared in a memo to the Saluda town council from the town’s business manager:
"Research indicates that those who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half as often as those who
don’t exercise. By providing a well-equipped gym for Saluda’s municipal employees, we should be able to reduce
the cost of our group health insurance coverage by approximately 50 percent and thereby achieve a balanced
town budget."
Discuss how well reasoned … etc.

This argument is completely flawed due to a number of reasons. It is based on the unwarranted assumption that by providing a gymming facility the members wont need much of a health coverage, which is completely flawed.

First of all, anybody can fall ill anywhere and anytime. Although a healthy body does decrease the tendency of falling ill but still there is no guarantee that the person
will not fall ill. There are numerous diseases which any amount of rigorous exercise cannot control eg. Flu, virus attacks etc. Also factors like stress, insomnia, food poisoning can arise due to a number of reasons on which a person has no control.

Moreover such an insurance also covers accidents, which are beyond immediate control and reducing the coverage will only add to the economic burden of the patient who might go through it.
Even if we do consider the assumption as being appropriate, there is still no assurance that all the employees will go to the gym regularly for improving their health. Unless put under some obligation, it is the natural tendency of human mind to find the easy way out and to only go after a 'low-hanging fruit'.

The argument also assumes that all the employees have a similar physical requirement which is again absurd. The employees will hail from different age groups and genders and therefore will have different bodily requirements which having a gymming facility might not be able to fully address. For example if there is a pregnant lady who is an employee or a physically disabled person ,they might not be able to use the gym at all and such a case will need special needs.

Some members might already be using some gymming or yoga facility ,and for them such a thing would be redundant or an add on. For such a case they would not want their coverage to be reduced.

In short, based on the above mentioned reasons, the argument of the town Business manager is completely flawed and the plan should be rectified at the earliest. There can be several other ways for the manager for achieving a balanced town budget.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:20, Gabby2581
Win goods inc. is a large multinational conglomerate. as a single business unit, the company's stock price is estimated to be $200. however, by adding the actual market stock prices of each of its individual business units, the stock price of the company as one unit would be $300. what is win goods experiencing in this scenario? a. diversification discount b. learning-curveeffects c. experience-curveeffects d. economies of scale
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20, tytybruce2
Carmen’s beauty salon has estimated monthly financing requirements for the next six months as follows: january $ 9,000 april $ 9,000 february 3,000 may 10,000 march 4,000 june 5,000 short-term financing will be utilized for the next six months. projected annual interest rates are: january 9 % april 16 % february 10 may 12 march 13 june 12 what long-term interest rate would represent a break-even point between using short-term financing and long-term financing?
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 22:50, tiffanibell71
Adding a complementary product to what is currently being produced is a demand management strategy used when: a. capacity exceeds demand for a product that has stable demand. b. price increases have failed to bring about demand management. c. demand exceeds capacity. d. demand exceeds 100 percent. e. the existing product has seasonal or cyclical demand.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 10:20, ineedhelp2285
Assume you plan to start a new enterprise; you know the probability of having losses for the first three years of operations is almost 90 percent, and you know you will report a substantial amount of income from other sources during those same three years. from a tax perspective, which of the following entity choices would not allow you to offset the entity losses against your income from other sources? c corporation s corporation llc general partnership
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The following appeared in a memo to the Saluda town council from the town’s business manager:
...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 30.12.2019 14:31