Business, 12.02.2020 03:13 skylarbrown018

Suppose a report on CNN says that there is an impending recession coming in the United States. As a result, Bert's family, as well as many other like minded families and individuals, reduce their spending and instead fill up their piggy banks for a potential rainy day. As a result of this behavior:a) Nothing in the economy changes as a result of people choosing to save up some money. b) The economy is actually harmed as there is a sharp decease in consumer spending. c) The economy is stimulated as individuals begin to save up money and therefore have more money to spend on goods. In macroeconomics, this result is known as:a) self-regulationb) a business cyclec) normal behaviord) piggy bank fatteninge) the paradox of thrift

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 22.06.2019 06:30, silas99

Selected data for stick’s design are given as of december 31, year 1 and year 2 (rounded to the nearest hundredth). year 2 year 1 net credit sales $25,000 $30,000 cost of goods sold 16,000 18,000 net income 2,000 2,800 cash 5,000 900 accounts receivable 3,000 2,000 inventory 2,000 3,600 current liabilities 6,000 5,000 compute the following: 1. current ratio for year 2 2. acid-test ratio for year 2 3. accounts receivable turnover for year 2 4. average collection period for year 2 5. inventory turnover for year 2

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 11:50, vdirectioner7634

The basic difference between macroeconomics and microeconomics is that: a. microeconomics looks at the forest (aggregate markets) while macroeconomics looks at the trees (individual markets). b. macroeconomics is concerned with groups of individuals while microeconomics is concerned with single countries. c. microeconomics is concerned with the trees (individual markets) while macroeconomics is concerned with the forest (aggregate markets). d. macroeconomics is concerned with generalization while microeconomics is concerned with specialization.

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 23:50, oopfloop2

The sarbanes-oxley act was passed to question 6 options: prevent fraud at public companies. replace all of the old accounting procedures with new ones. improve the accuracy of the company's financial reporting. both a and c

Answers: 3

continue

You know the right answer?

Suppose a report on CNN says that there is an impending recession coming in the United States. As a...