Megan is concerned about the legality of her idea of firing union workers in order to hire employees willing to work for less pay. megan values ethics, but has little concern for other types.

Please see complete question below :

Harry, Sirly, and Bo are in the midst of a heated discussion. As the chief operating officers of the U-Scream Ice Cream Corporation, they are reviewing the latest financial reports. Intense competition has resulted in deceased profits. Each of the three officers has their own view of how to reverse the current trend.

Harry suggests cutting costs by firing union employees and hiring replacement workers at lower wages. He has directed the firm's attorney to find a loophole in the contract that will allow for this action. Sirly protests, stating that Harry's proposal is unethical and unfair. Sirly feels that every stakeholder should be treated equally, and that profiting at the expense of others is foolhardy.

Bo, agreeing in part with Sirly, states, "We must be sensitive to all affected parties, but clearly our primary goal is to make a profit for our owners." In an attempt to resolve the conflict between Harry and Sirly, Bo offers an alternative suggestion: reduce the firm's charitable contributions until acceptable profit levels are realized. Sirly is outraged and reminds Bo of the social responsibilities that U-Scream Ice Cream has to the community, environment, suppliers, employees, and stockholders.

Harry is concerned about the legality of firing union workers in order to hire workers willing to work for less pay. Harry values ethics, but has little concern for other types.

a) integrity-based

b) compliance-based

c) socially-based

d) policy-based

Harry values compliance-based ethics (b)

Explanation:

Compliance-based ethics have some rules attached to them, either by law or as company policy as stipulated in the employment contract. In either case, employees and employers are obliged to comply with those rules.

Here, Harry values of ethics is in consideration of the legal consequences of non-compliance with terms and conditions of employment as enshrined in their policy.

answer; possession utility;