Business, 28.12.2019 00:31 3ds

Which of the following conditions is necessary for whistle-blowing to be morally permissible, but not morally obligatory?

a. the whistle-blower has documented evidence that would convince a reasonable, impartial observer that one’s view of the situation is correct, and that the company’s product poses a serious danger to the public.
b. the employee has good reason to believe that by going public, the necessary changes will be brought about.
c. the whistle-blower has reason to believe that he/she will be seen as failing to be loyal to the company.
d. the employee has exhausted the internal procedures and possibilities within the firm, maybe even to the board of directors.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 22.06.2019 07:10, mia7955

Refer to the payoff matrix. suppose that speedy bike and power bike are the only two bicycle manufacturing firms serving the market. both can choose large or small advertising budgets. is there a nash equilibrium solution to this game?

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 07:30, yzafer3971

An instance where sellers should work to keep relationships with customers is when they instance where selllars should work to keep relationships with customers is when they feel that the product

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 16:30, sammuelanderson1371

Which of the following has the largest impact on opportunity cost

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00, nestergurl101

With the slowdown of business, how can starbucks ensure that the importance of leadership development does not get overlooked?

Answers: 3

continue

You know the right answer?

Which of the following conditions is necessary for whistle-blowing to be morally permissible, but no...