Business, 19.12.2019 20:31 abelsoto

Which statement best expresses the significance of the requirement of precedent in legal argument? modes of similarity between legal cases are often the result of creative thinking by lawyers and judges. analogical arguments in law are often considerably more elusive than those dealing with ordinary subject matter. the primary analogues in law do not all have equal weight. similar cases must be decided similarly. which statement best represents the roles of legal precedent and of the case at trial, in terms of analogues for a legal argument? legal precedents function as secondary analogues within many legal arguments. similarities between the case at trial and cases of legal precedent function as the secondary analogues in a legal argument. the case at trial functions as a primary analogue within many legal arguments. the case at trial functions as the secondary analogue within many legal arguments. which of the following is not true of legal arguments? legal argument often involves showing how one case should be considered analogous to another. some legal arguments also appeal to moral reasoning. the relevance of the similarities between legal cases is rarely debatable. analogical reasoning is often required in decisions involving statutory law.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 21.06.2019 19:10, corcoranrobert1959

Goals that are overly ambitious can discourage employees and decrease motivation, yet the idea of stretch goals is proposed as a way to get people fired up and motivated. as a manager, how might you decide where to draw the line between a “good” stretch goal and a “bad” one that is unrealistic?

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 14:10, miacervenka

When paul o’neill joined alcoa as ceo, he set a , that there would be zero workplace accidents. a lot of people in the organization thought this was impossible given how dangerous some aluminum-manufacturing jobs are, but alcoa’s safety record improved tremendously. as the board of governors of the american red cross considers planning, one option is to make strategic plans and then direct managers to align tactical and operational plans accordingly. another option is to have planning specialists managers across the organization make their own plans. why might this organization’s executives opt for the latter approach? check all that apply. (a) the environment is a dynamic one, and department and frontline managers can come up with more responsive plans than can central leadership. (b)resources will be better coordinated across the organization in support of the overall strategy.(c) senior leadership will have more control over the organization’s direction. (d)when managers come up with their own plans, they are likely to be more committed to following through on them.

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 17:30, Envious1552

Gary lives in an area that receives high rainfall and thunderstorms throughout the year. which device would be useful to him to maintain his computer?

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, jonathanvega424

There is just one person in our group, silvia, who seems to have radically different ideas about how to complete our project. she seems to purposely disagree with the majority opinions of the rest of us though yesterday she said something that made a lot of sense to us solve our production problem. i suggested to the entire group today that we hear silvia’s suggestions and asked silvia to share in-depth more of what she said yesterday. i am using which adaptive leader behavior?

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

Which statement best expresses the significance of the requirement of precedent in legal argument?...