Gas the cost accounting manager at cambria chemicals (cc), you are responsible for compiling and reporting various performance measures to the senior managers. the company instituted many efficiency improvement programs recently, and the cfo has asked you to measure and report partial productivity for both labor and materials. data for the last two years follow. year 2 year 1 gallons input (thousands) 9,900 8,900 labor-hours (thousands) 9,300 6,900 gallons of output (thousands) 11,700 9,700 from the accounting records, you also gather the following information for the two years. year 2 year 1 cost of inputs (per gallon) $ 76 $ 84 wage rate (per hour) $ 23 $ 18 total manufacturing overhead $ 1,330,000 $ 1,210,000 selling price of output (per gallon) $ 365 $ 370 required: a. compute the total factor productivity measures for year 1 and year 2 based on the three inputs (material, labor, and overhead). (round your answers to 3 decimal places.)

Kahn company's static budget was based on sales volume of 12,000 units. its flexible budget was based on sales volume of 14,000 units. based on this information multiple choice the sales volume variance is expected to be unfavorable. the materials cost volume variance is expected to be favorable. the labor cost volume variance is expected to be unfavorable. none of the answers is correct.

What would not cause duff beer’s production possibilities curve to expand in the short run? a. improved manufacturing technology b. additional resources c. increased demand

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy. the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.