Stan, a salesperson for trucks & autos, promises uri a certain car will give him a "smooth ride." stan offers a test drive, which uri declines. he buys the car but soon realizes its suspension is in poor condition. uri can rescind the contract on the ground ofa. mistake. b. fraud. c. none of the choices. d. undue influence.

C, none of the choices

Explanation:

from the qeustion, it can be seen that Uri was offered a test ride of the car but he clearly refused. For him to have bought that car without a test drive and later realise the car has a faulty suspenion, he cannot rescind the contract on any of the bases because if he had agreed to the test drive, he would have found out about the faukty suspension and woudn't have bought that car.

It is clearly Uri's fault that he ended up with a car that has a faulty susppension. this isn't a case of fraud or mistake on the part of Stan, neither did Stan unduely influence him to buy the car according to the question.

Cheers.

answer; be sure that the information on file is correct;

answerindividual preferences are not revealed in the market for the good;