subject
Business, 06.12.2019 04:31 interndon

2. x company has the following accounting balances at the end of the year before adjustments: accounts receivable $ 50,000 allowance for uncollectible accounts (1,000) net sales 150,000 bad debts expense 0 the company estimates that 2% of net sales will be uncollectible. after the correct adjusting entry has been made, which of the following is correct about bad debts expense for the year and allowance for uncollectible accounts at the end of the year? multiple choice bad debts expense will be $1,000 on the income statement and allowance for uncollectible accounts will be $(2,000) on the balance sheet. bad debts expense will be $3,000 on the income statement and allowance for uncollectible accounts will be $(4,000) on the balance sheet. bad debts expense will be $2,000 on the income statement and allowance for uncollectible accounts will be $(3,000) on the balance sheet. bad debts expense will be $3,000 on the income statement and allowance for uncollectible accounts will be $(2,000) on the balance sheet.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50, ShawnSaviro4918
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00, 1129682
Factors like the unemployment rate, the stock market, global trade, economic policy, and the economic situation of other countries have no influence on the financial status of individuals. true or false
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30, badgirl2005
Suppose you win a small lottery and have the choice of two ways to be paid: you can accept the money in a lump sum or in a series of payments over time. if you pick the lump sum, you get $2,950 today. if you pick payments over time, you get three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. 1) at an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 2) at an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 3) years after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. by wild coincidence, she has just won another lottery with the same payout schemes. she must make a quick decision about whether to collect her money under the lump sum or the payments over time. what is the best advice to give your friend? a) the lump sum is always better. b) the payments over time are always better. c) it will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. d) none of these answers is good advice.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:10, boofpack9775
As the inventor of hypertension medication, onesure pharmaceuticals (osp) inc. was able to reap the benefits of economies of scale due to a large consumer demand for the drug. even when competitors later developed similar drugs after the expiry of osp's patents, regular users did not want to switch because they were concerned about possible side effects. which of the following benefits does this scenario best illustrate? a. first-mover advantages b. social benefits c. network externalities d. fringe benefits
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
2. x company has the following accounting balances at the end of the year before adjustments: accou...

Questions in other subjects: