On may 15, 2010, the right brothers painting services, llc ("the right brothers") contracted with sally sullenberger to paint her vacation home at kill devil hills, north carolina. pursuant to the contract, the right brothers were obligated to begin painting on may 30, 2010, and finish the work by june 30, 2010. the total contract price was $15,000. the right brothers did not initiate performance before june 30, 2010, and on july 15, 2010, sullenberger arranged for a substitute painting company, jake yeager master paint company, inc., ("jake yeager") to perform the work. jake yeager completed the work, and charged $23,000 for its services. on august 30, 2013, sullenberger filed a complaint in dare county, north carolina district court, seeking $8,000 and court costs and attorney's fees from the right brothers. according to north carolina law, the statute of limitations period applicable to a breach of contract action is three (3) years from the date of the breach. is the right brothers painting services, llc legally and/or ethically obligated to pay sally sullenberger the damages she has requested

An employer who is considering hiring eva has asked donna, eva’s former supervisor, for a report on eva. in truth, eva’s work for donna has been only average. however, eva is donna’s friend, and donna knows that eva probably will not get the job if she says anything negative about eva, and donna knows that eva desperately needs the job. further, donna knows that if the situation were reversed, she would not want eva to mention her deficiencies. nevertheless, it has been donna’s policy to reveal the deficiencies of employees when she has been asked for references by employers, and she knows that some of eva’s faults may be bothersome to this particular employer. finally, this employer has leveled with donna in the past when donna has asked for a report on people who have worked for him. should donna reveal deficiencies in eva’s past performance? (remember to use one of the three moral theories acceptable for this test to solve this dilemma. any discussion of any personal opinion, religious perspective, or theory other than the moral theories acceptable for this test will result in a score of "0" for this question.)

What is the difference between an "i" statement and a "you" statement? a. the "i" statement is non-confrontational b. the "you" statement is non-confrontational c. the "i" statement is argumentative d. the "you" statement is neutral in tone select the best answer from the choices provided

Winners of the georgia lotto drawing are given the choice of receiving the winning amount divided equally over 2121 years or as a lump-sum cash option amount. the cash option amount is determined by discounting the annual winning payment at 88% over 2121 years. this week the lottery is worth $1616 million to a single winner. what would the cash option payout be?