You are working on a project that was proceeding well until a manufacturing glitch occurred that requires corrective action. it turns out the glitch was an unintentional enhancement to the product, and the marketing people are absolutely crazy about its potential. the corrective action is canceled, and you continue to produce the product with the newly discovered enhancement. as the project manager, you know that variance has occurred. which of the following is true?
a. attribute inspection determines whether measurements fall within tolerable results.
b. random variances, known or predictable variances, and variances that are always present in the process are known as common causes of variance.
c. common causes of variance, also known as special-cause variances, are situations that are unique and not easily controlled at the operational level.
d. scatter diagrams display the relationships between an independent and a dependent variable to show variations in the process to prove or disprove cause-and-effect relationships.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: Business
Business, 22.06.2019 10:40, emojigirl5754
Two assets have the following expected returns and standard deviations when the risk-free rate is 5%: asset a e(ra) = 18.5% σa = 20% asset b e(rb) = 15% σb = 27% an investor with a risk aversion of a = 3 would find that on a risk-return basis. a. only asset a is acceptable b. only asset b is acceptable c. neither asset a nor asset b is acceptable d. both asset a and asset b are acceptable
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, jcastronakaya
When it is 4: 00 a. m. in halifax, it is 1: 00 p. m. in karachi, and when it is 9: 00 a. m. in karachi, it is 5: 00 a. m. in warsaw. mary left halifax to fly to karachi, but she accidentally left her watch on warsaw time. according to mary’s watch, she left halifax at 9: 40 p. m. on monday. the local time when she arrived at karachi was 3: 00 p. m. tuesday. how long was mary’s flight? a. 9 hours, 20 minutes b. 13 hours, 20 minutes c. 14 hours, 20 minutes d. 17 hours, 20 minutes
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00, kyledsmith18
In this multi-channel funnel report, which two channels have the highest overlap and would benefit from coordinated marketing messaging?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
You are working on a project that was proceeding well until a manufacturing glitch occurred that req...
Questions in other subjects:
Spanish, 24.04.2020 23:20
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 23:20
Advanced Placement (AP), 24.04.2020 23:20
