subject
Business, 26.11.2019 21:31 tajonae04

Suppose two countries, country a and country b, have a similar real gdp per capita. country a has an average economic growth rate of 2% and country b has an average economic growth rate of 3.3%. in the long run, what can we predict about living standards in the two countries?
a. country a's living standards will increase much more rapidly in the long run.
b. country b's living standards will increase much more rapidly in the long run.
c. growth rates are not related to living standards.
d. the countries wil experience similar increases in their living standards.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:30, jefersonzoruajas
Which of the following best explains why online retail companies have an advantage over regular stores? a. their employees make less money because they mostly perform unskilled tasks. b. they are able to keep distribution costs low by negotiating deals with shipping companies. c. their transactions require expensive state-of-the-art technological devices. d. they have a larger number of potential customers because people anywhere can buy from them.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00, ldelgado97
Wo firms, a and b, each currently dump 50 tons of chemicals into the local river. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. it costs firm a $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river, and it costs firm b $50 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river. the government gives each firm 20 pollution permits. government officials are not sure whether to allow the firms to buy or sell the pollution permits to each other. what is the total cost of reducing pollution if firms are not allowed to buy and sell pollution permits from each other? what is the total cost of reducing pollution if the firms are allowed to buy and sell permits from each other? a. $3,000; $1,500 b. $4,500; $3,500 c. $4,500; $4,000 d. $4,500; $2,500
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00, amanquen35
How do the percentages of the 65 customer satisfaction ratings in that actually fall into the intervals [formula62.mml ± s], [formula62.mml ± 2s], and [formula62.mml ± 3s] compare to those given by the empirical rule? do these comparisons indicate that the statistical inferences you made in parts b and c are reasonably valid? (round your answers to the nearest whole number. omit the "%" sign in your
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Suppose two countries, country a and country b, have a similar real gdp per capita. country a has an...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 01:40
Konu
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 01:40