Business law critical thinking group assignment. two african american plaintiffs sued the producers of the reality television series the bachelor and the bachelorette forracial discrimination, the plaintiffs claimed that the shows have never featured a person of color in the lead role, plaintiffsalso alleged that the producers failed to provide people of color who auditioned for lead roles with the same opportunitiesto compete as white people who auditioned,1. the first group will assess whether the plaintiffs can establish a prima facie case of disparate-treatment (intentional)discrimination. z the second group will consider whether the plaintiffs can establish disparate-impact discrimination3, the third group will assume that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case and that the burden has shifted to theemployer to articulate a legal reason for not hiring the plaintiffs what legitimate reasons might the employer assert for nothiring the plaintiffs in this situation? should the law require television producers to hire persons of color for lead roles inreality television shows? explain your answec

Jimmy owns an ice cream parlor. he designs a schedule for the different tasks the employees have to perform in order to prevent monotony at work. according to the schedule, if an employee makes waffle cones on a day, he serves ice creams the next day and clears the tables on the day after that. jimmy is using the approach at his ice cream parlor.

Using the exxon data as an example what would be the market capitalization of penny's pickles if each share is selling for $175.35?

Alandlord rented an art studio to an artist. under the terms of the signed, written, two-year lease, the artist agreed to pay the landlord $1,000 per month and to assume responsibility for all necessary repairs. after the first year of the lease, the artist assigned the balance of his lease to a sculptor. the landlord approved the sculptor as a tenant and accepted two rent payments from her, and then the landlord sold the building to an investor. the sculptor had made two payments to the investor when an electrical fire broke out in the studio, injuring the sculptor. the fire was caused by faulty wiring. the landlord was aware that there was a dangerous wiring problem when he leased the property to the artist. but when the landlord discovered how costly repairs would be, he decided it would be more profitable to sell the property than to repair it. the problem was not easily discoverable by anyone other than an expert electrician, and the landlord did not tell the artist, the sculptor, or the investor about the problem. the sculptor sues to recover damages for her injuries. from whom can the sculptor recover?