Kelly made a written contract to sell certain land to brown and gave brown a deed to the land. thereafter, kelly sued brown to get back a 20-foot strip of the land. kelly claimed that before making the written contract, it was agreed that kelly would sell all of his land to brown to make it easier for brown to get a building permit, but after that was done, the 20-foot strip would be reconveyed to kelly. was kelly entitled to the 20-foot strip? what ethical values are involved? [brown v. kelly, 545 so. 2d 518 (fla. app.)]