subject
Business, 23.10.2019 05:00 ani61

The city of ruth has been awarded a $1,000,000 federal expenditure-driven grant to improve bike trails. the federal government advanced the city $600,000 when the grant was awarded on january 10, 20x8. the city incurred $418,000 of qualifying expenditures during 20x8. how much should the city of ruth recognize as deferred revenue for its fiscal year ending december 31, 20x8?

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 17:40, Leffew
Assume the government imposes a $2.25 tax on suppliers, which results in a shift of the supply curve from s1 to s2. the price the seller receives for the product after paying the tax is
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:00, jason9394
Identify an organization with the low-total-cost value proposition and suggest at least two possible measures within each of the four balanced scorecard perspectives.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 06:00, slimt69561
When an interest-bearing note comes due and is uncollectible, the journal entry includes debitingaccounts receivable and crediting notes receivable and interest revenue. accounts receivable and crediting interest revenue. notes receivable and crediting accounts receivable and interest revenue. notes receivable and crediting accounts receivable.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50, ShawnSaviro4918
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The city of ruth has been awarded a $1,000,000 federal expenditure-driven grant to improve bike trai...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 19.03.2020 21:35
Konu
Mathematics, 19.03.2020 21:35