Match (by number) each money market instrument with its description:
(i)-money market instrument
(ii)-commercial paper nothing
(iii)treasury bills nothing
(iv)-repurchase agreements nothing
(v)federal funds nothing
(vi)banker's acceptances nothing. description 1. these instruments are typically overnight loans between banks of their deposits at the federal reserve. description: 2. a debt instrument sold by a bank to depositors that pays annual interest of a given amount and at maturity pays back the original purchase price. description: 3. a short-term debt instrument issued by large banks and well-known corporations. description: 4. these money market instruments are created in the course of carrying out international trade. this is a bank draft (a promise of payment similar to a check) issued by a firm, payable at some future date, and guaranteed for a fee by a bank. description: 5. these short-term debt instruments of the us government are issued in three-, six-, and 12-month maturities to finance the federal government. description: 6. these instruments are effectively short-term loans (usually with a maturity of less than two weeks) for which treasury bills serve as collateral, which the lender receives if the borrower does not pay back the loan.

The following information is available for jase company: market price per share of common stock $25.00 earnings per share on common stock $1.25 which of the following statements is correct? a. the price-earnings ratio is 20 and a share of common stock was selling for 20 times the amount of earnings per share at the end of the year. b. the market price per share and the earnings per share are not statistically related to each other. c. the price-earnings ratio is 5% and a share of common stock was selling for 5% more than the amount of earnings per share at the end of the year. d. the price-earnings ratio is 10 and a share of common stock was selling for 125 times the amount of earnings per share at the end of the year.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

On december 31, 2013, coronado company issues 173,000 stock-appreciation rights to its officers entitling them to receive cash for the difference between the market price of its stock and a pre-established price of $10. the fair value of the sars is estimated to be $5 per sar on december 31, 2014; $2 on december 31, 2015; $10 on december 31, 2016; and $8 on december 31, 2017. the service period is 4 years, and the exercise period is 7 years. prepare a schedule that shows the amount of compensation expense allocable to each year affected by the stock-appreciation rights plan.