Business, 26.09.2019 23:00 gloverj9639
General inertia corporation made a pro rata distribution of $50,000 to tiara, inc. in partial liquidation of the company on december 31, 20x3. tiara, inc. owns 500 shares (50%) of general inertia. the distribution was in exchange for 250 shares of tiara's stock in the company. after the partial liquidation, tiara continued to own 50% of the remaining stock in general inertia. at the time of the distribution, the shares had a fair market value of $200 per share. tiara's income tax basis in the shares was $100 per share. general inertia had total e& p of $800,000 at the time of the distribution. what amount of dividend or capital gain does tiara recognize because of the transaction?
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 10:40, emojigirl5754
Two assets have the following expected returns and standard deviations when the risk-free rate is 5%: asset a e(ra) = 18.5% σa = 20% asset b e(rb) = 15% σb = 27% an investor with a risk aversion of a = 3 would find that on a risk-return basis. a. only asset a is acceptable b. only asset b is acceptable c. neither asset a nor asset b is acceptable d. both asset a and asset b are acceptable
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10, nat8475
The prebisch–singer hypothesis concludes that: a. technology lowers the cost of manufactured products, so developing countries should see an increase in their terms of trade. b. developing countries experience a long-run decline in their terms of trade, as the demand for primary products in higher-income countries declines relative to their demand for manufactured goods. c. because of unfair trading practices, labor in developing countries is exploited. d. opec has been responsible for a slowdown in the world's standard of living.
Answers: 3
General inertia corporation made a pro rata distribution of $50,000 to tiara, inc. in partial liquid...
Physics, 07.04.2020 19:57
English, 07.04.2020 19:57
Social Studies, 07.04.2020 19:58