subject
Business, 26.09.2019 22:00 nativebabydoll35

Catamount company had current and accumulated e& p of $500,000 at december 31, 20x3. on december 31, the company made a distribution of land to its sole shareholder, caroline west. the land's fair market value was $200,000 and its tax and e& p basis to catamount was $250,000. the tax consequences of the distribution to catamount in 20x3 would be:

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 19:50, love12236
Suppose your rich uncle gave you $50,000, which you plan to use for graduate school. you will make the investment now, you expect to earn an annual return of 6%, and you will make 4 equal annual withdrawals, beginning 1 year from today. under these conditions, how large would each withdrawal be so there would be no funds remaining in the account after the 4th?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 00:00, 12monkey6
If his parents cannot alex with college, and two of his scholarships will be awarded to other students if he does not accept them immediately, which is the best option for him?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30, bella51032
True or false entrepreneurs try to meet the needs of the marketplace by supplying a service or product
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00, adrianbanuelos1999
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Catamount company had current and accumulated e& p of $500,000 at december 31, 20x3. on december...

Questions in other subjects: