In benny v. city car dealership, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a con-tract for the sale of a car. now a trial court in the same state is deciding daphne v. even steven auto deals, inc., a case with similar facts. under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to
a. allow the minor to cancel the contract.
b. disregard the benny case.
c. order the minor to cancel the contract.
d. require the minor to fulfill the contract.
Answers: 2
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30, Taylor73836
Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 05:40, Jenan25
Grant, inc., acquired 30% of south co.’s voting stock for $200,000 on january 2, year 1, and did not elect the fair value option. the price equaled the carrying amount and the fair value of the interest purchased in south’s net assets. grant’s 30% interest in south gave grant the ability to exercise significant influence over south’s operating and financial policies. during year 1, south earned $80,000 and paid dividends of $50,000. south reported earnings of $100,000 for the 6 months ended june 30, year 2, and $200,000 for the year ended december 31, year 2. on july 1, year 2, grant sold half of its stock in south for $150,000 cash. south paid dividends of $60,000 on october 1, year 2. before income taxes, what amount should grant include in its year 1 income statement as a result of the investment?
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 12:00, hannaboo53
Identify at least 3 body language messages that project a positive attitude
Answers: 2
In benny v. city car dealership, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a con-tract fo...
Geography, 01.04.2021 05:10
Chemistry, 01.04.2021 05:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 05:10
Arts, 01.04.2021 05:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 05:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 05:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 05:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 05:10