Which phrase explains what the post-trust era is?
a. a period in which the government no long...
Which phrase explains what the post-trust era is?
a. a period in which the government no longer allows monopolies or trusts to form
b. a period characterized by the formation of trusts to manage the wealth of businesses
c. a period in which people put more of their trust in big business than in big government
d. a period in which the government allows financial trusts to try to make the economy safer
e. a period in which people have lost the trust they once had in the business community
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: Business
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30, nickespinosa11
Gary becker's controversial the economics of discrimination concludes that price discrimination has no effect on final profits. price discrimination benefits monopolies. labor discrimination in hiring results in more efficient allocations of production. discrimination in hiring practices has no effect on final profits. labor discrimination harms firms that practice it due to increased labor costs. price discrimination harms monopolies, which refutes over two centuries of economic theory.
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 06:50, jungcoochie101
On january 1, vermont corporation had 40,000 shares of $10 par value common stock issued and outstanding. all 40,000 shares has been issued in a prior period at $20.00 per share. on february 1, vermont purchased 3,750 shares of treasury stock for $24 per share and later sold the treasury shares for $21 per share on march 1. the journal entry to record the purchase of the treasury shares on february 1 would include a credit to treasury stock for $90,000 debit to treasury stock for $90,000 credit to a gain account for $112,500 debit to a loss account for $112,500
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00, winstonbendariovvygn
If the family’s net monthly income is 7,800 what percent of the income is spent on food clothing and housing?
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 17:20, iilovejohnccena1022
David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum. should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Questions in other subjects:
Geography, 11.10.2019 20:50
Chemistry, 11.10.2019 20:50
Health, 11.10.2019 20:50
Computers and Technology, 11.10.2019 20:50
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 20:50
