Michelle fleshner worked for pepose vision institute (pvi), a surgical practice. she was fired after she provided information to the department of labor about pvi’s overtime pay policy. she sued for wrongful termination, and the jury awarded her $125,000. after the trial, a juror told pvi’s attorneys that another juror had made anti-semitic statements during jury deliberations. the comments concerned a witness who testified on pvi’s behalf. according to the juror, the other juror said, about the witness: "she is a jewish witch." "she is a penny-pinching jew." "she was such a cheap jew that she did not want to pay plaintiff unemployment compensation." another juror confirmed the remarks. pvi filed a motion for a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct. the trial judge held that the comments did not prevent a fair trial from occurring. pvi appealed. do you think such comments are sufficient to require a new trial, or must a juror’s bias be discovered during voir dire for it to matter? explain your response in 2-3 paragraphs

Salty sensations snacks company manufactures three types of snack foods: tortilla chips, potato chips, and pretzels. the company has budgeted the following costs for the upcoming period: 1 factory depreciation $33,782.00 2 indirect labor 84,456.00 3 factory electricity 8,446.00 4 indirect materials 40,356.00 5 selling expenses 26,900.00 6 administrative expenses 17,200.00 7 total costs $211,140.00 factory overhead is allocated to the three products on the basis of processing hours. the products had the following production budget and processing hours per case: budgeted volume (cases) processing hours per case tortilla chips 3,600 0.25 potato chips 5,300 0.11 pretzels 2,300 0.49 total 11,200 required: a. determine the single plantwide factory overhead rate.* b. use the factory overhead rate in (a) to determine the amount of total and per-case factory overhead allocated to each of the three products under generally accepted accounting principles. refer to the amount descriptions list provided for the exact wording of the answer choices for text entries.* * if required, round your answers to the nearest cen

Tiana daniels enterprise’s trial balance as at december 31, 2016 did not balance. on february 15, 2017 the following errors were detected: errorsi. water rates had been undercast by $2, 000.  ii. a cheque paid to yvonne walch of $2, 680 had been posted to the credit side of her account.  iii. discount received total of $1, 260 had been posted to the debit side of the discount allowed account as $1, 620.  iv. rent paid in the amount of $24, 000 had been posted to the credit of the rent received account.  v. wayne returned goods valuing $1, 680 to daniels enterprise but had been completely omitted from the books.    required: 1. prepare the journal entries to correct the errors.  (narrations required)                    14.5 marks  2.    prepare the suspense account showing clearly the original trial balance error.          8 marks

Brandt enterprises is considering a new project that has a cost of $1,000,000, and the cfo set up the following simple decision tree to show its three most likely scenarios. the firm could arrange with its work force and suppliers to cease operations at the end of year 1 should it choose to do so, but to obtain this abandonment option, it would have to make a payment to those parties. how much is the option to abandon worth to the firm?