When congress passed the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002, it imposed greater regulation on public companies and their auditors and required increased accountability. which of the following is not a provision of the act?
a. executives must certify the appropriateness of the financial statements.
b. the act provides criminal penalties for fraud.
c. auditors may not provide specific nonaudit services for their audit clients.
d. audit firms must be rotated on a periodic basis.
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: Business
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10, weeman6546
Lambert manufacturing has $100,000 to invest in either project a or project b. the following data are available on these projects (ignore income taxes.): project a project b cost of equipment needed now $100,000 $60,000 working capital investment needed now - $40,000 annual cash operating inflows $40,000 $35,000 salvage value of equipment in 6 years $10,000 - both projects will have a useful life of 6 years and the total cost approach to net present value analysis. at the end of 6 years, the working capital investment will be released for use elsewhere. lambert's required rate of return is 14%. the net present value of project b is:
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00, heavenwagner
In microeconomics, the point at which supply and demand meet is called the blank price
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 16:40, krystalsozaa
Determining effects of stock splits oracle corp has had the following stock splits since its inception. effective date split amount october 12, 2000 2 for 1 january 18, 2000 2 for 1 february 26, 1999 3 for 2 august 15, 1997 3 for 2 april 16, 1996 3 for 2 february 22, 1995 3 for 2 november 8, 1993 2 for 1 june 16,1989 2 for 1 december 21, 1987 2 for 1 march 9, 1987 2 for 1 a. if the par value of oracle shares was originally $2, what would oracle corp. report as par value per share on its 2015 balance sheet? compute the revised par value after each stock split. round answers to three decimal places.
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
When congress passed the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002, it imposed greater regulation on public compani...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 14:00
History, 11.12.2021 14:00
English, 11.12.2021 14:00
