Aceramics studio contracted with an artist to produce cups and saucers designed by the artist. the artist was an established designer of collectible ceramic dinnerware, and the studio did production work for many artists who created ceramic dinnerware. the price and quantity term of the contract read: “2,000 sets of the cups and saucers at $5 each, payable on delivery.” the contract contained a merger clause. the studio produced the cups and saucers and delivered them along with a bill for $20,000 (4,000 pieces at $5 per piece). the artist refused to pay more than $10,000 (2,000 sets at $5 per set). at the trial of the studio’s action against the artist for breach of contract, the studio introduced evidence of an established practice in the studio industry to price cup-and-saucer sets on a per-piece, not a per-set, basis. is the studio’s evidence admissible?

i tried to get the answer but i could not find it

i know right it’s not fair some people are just so rude unlike you your actually trying to get to know people and i think that is very kind

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.