Mankus inc. is considering using stocks of an old raw material in a special project. the special project would require all 180 kilograms of the raw material that are in stock and that originally cost the company $2,406 in total. if the company were to buy new supplies of this raw material on the open market, it would cost $7.05 per kilogram. however, the company has no other use for this raw material and would sell it at the discounted price of $6.35 per kilogram if it were not used in the special project. the sale of the raw material would involve delivery to the purchaser at a total cost of $68 for all 180 kilograms. what is the relevant cost of the 180 kilograms of the raw material when deciding whether to proceed with the special project?

As related to a company completing the purchase to pay process, is there an accounting journal entry "behind the scenes" when xyz company pays for the goods within 10 days of the invoice (gross method is used for discounts and terms are 2/10 net 30) that updates the general ledger?

There is just one person in our group, silvia, who seems to have radically different ideas about how to complete our project. she seems to purposely disagree with the majority opinions of the rest of us though yesterday she said something that made a lot of sense to us solve our production problem. i suggested to the entire group today that we hear silvia’s suggestions and asked silvia to share in-depth more of what she said yesterday. i am using which adaptive leader behavior?

Upper a report about the decline of western investment in third world countries included this: "after years of daily flights comma several european airlines halted passenger service. foreign investment fell 400 percent during the 1990 s." what is wrong with this statement? choose the correct answer below. a. if foreign investment fell by 100 % comma it would be totally eliminated comma so it is not possible for it to fall by more than 100 %. b. the actual amount of the decrease in foreign investment is less than 100%. c. if foreign investment fell by 100%, it would be cut in half. thus, a decrease of 200% means that it would be totally eliminated, and a decrease of more than 200% is impossible. d. the statement does not mention the initial amount of foreign investment.