Your product fails about 2% of the time, on average. some customers purchase the extended warranty you offer in which you will replace the product if it fails. suppose that you have currently set the price of the extended warranty at 2% of the product price. an analyst at your company argues that after purchasing the extended warranty, customers are less likely to exercise caution when using the product because they will know that they can get their product replaced. the analyst is claiming that will cause the claim rate to be than 2%. true or false: you should set the price of the extended warranty at less than 2% of the product price.

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?