subject
Business, 27.08.2019 07:30 kyeilahj

True/false/explain – if all production processes were subject to constant returns to scales for all output levels, monopolistic competition would not lead to the problem of “excess capacity”.
true/false/explain – monopolistic competition is characterized by free entry and exit so in the long run, there is no deadweight loss associated with this market structure.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 03:30, skylar1315
Used cars usually have options: higher depreciation rate than new cars lower financing costs than new cars lower insurance premiums than new cars lower maintenance costs than new cars
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:10, srice6
1. the political environment in india has proven to be critical to company performance for both pepsico and coca-cola india. what specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? if not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. timing of entry into the indian market brought different results for pepsico and coca-cola india. what benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? 3. the indian market is enormous in terms of population and geography. how have the two companies responded to the sheer scale of operations in india in terms of product policies, promotional activities, pricing policies, and distribution arrangements? 4. “global localization” (glocalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. give examples for each company from the case.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30, admierewebb
What talents or skills do u admire most in others
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
True/false/explain – if all production processes were subject to constant returns to scales for all...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 16.11.2020 21:50