Through it is possible to quantify the trade-offs to determine whether to accept or reject environmentally-related activities and programs.

The answer is "risk management".

Risk management is the way toward distinguishing, evaluating and controlling dangers to an association's capital and income. These dangers, or dangers, could originate from a wide assortment of sources, including money related vulnerability, legitimate liabilities, key administration mistakes, mishaps and cataclysmic events. IT security dangers and information related dangers, and the hazard the executives systems to lighten them, have turned into a best need for digitized organizations. Thus, a hazard the executives plan progressively incorporates organizations' procedures for recognizing and controlling dangers to its advanced resources, including restrictive corporate information, a client's actually recognizable data and protected innovation.  

cognitive overload: having a lot on your mind impairs decision-making and tends to result in the simplest, but not necessarily best, option being selected.

empathy gaps: overlooking how you might feel in a different situation can result in unnecessary purchases, such as overbuying when shopping for food on an empty stomach.

optimism and overconfidence: wearing rose-tinted glasses and having unrealistic expectations about the future can affect money management and leave you unprepared for a change in circumstance.

instant gratification: seeking instant gratification drives impulsive spending and can undermine long-term planning and savings.

harmful habits: automatic or mindless behaviour can amplify a poor financial decision as it becomes a recurring event.

social norms: we are heavily influenced by the actions of others; while this can be in certain circumstances, it also contributes to the pressure to keep up with the joneses through conspicuous consumption.

because she sucked. : )

(but so does trump, don't @ me)