Business, 05.07.2019 11:00 evarod

Suppose the production of electricity by a utility generates pollution that harms others. suppose also that coase bargaining occur between the utility and the victims of pollution but that the utility has not been legally liable for the damages from its pollution. how would making the utility legally liable for the damages from its pollution affect pollution reduction?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 22.06.2019 03:50, haydenbell269

John is a 45-year-old manager who enjoys playing basketball in his spare time with his teenage sons and their friends. at work he finds that he is better able to solve problems that come up because of his many years of experience, but while on the court, he finds he is not as good keeping track of the ball while worrying about the other players. john's experience is:

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 07:30, yoyoho6218

Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 10:40, esta54

At cooly cola, we are testing the appeal of our new diet one cola. in a taste test of 250 randomly chosen cola drinkers, 200 consumers preferred diet one cola to the leading brand. assuming that the sample were large enough, the large-sample 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of cola drinkers that prefer diet one cola would be:

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, alexis9658

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

Suppose the production of electricity by a utility generates pollution that harms others. suppose al...