It's now pretty well established that apreviously unstudied fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis—batrachos is Greek for "froga-or Bd for short) is responsible for the mass extinction of so many frogs. Why hadn't it killed them all before? a. The frogs are more biologically vulnerable because of changes in their skin
b. Radioactive fallout made it more deadly
c. It mutated
d. Boats and planes weren't around​

this protocol provides a detailed procedure for agarose-based ip to purify and enrich the protein of interest.

yes it is   dangerous

explanation:

because that foot is discusting and could get you sick

1. a host loses nutrients to a parasite

2. a parasite only benefits when the host is alive (cause if the host dies the parasite dies with it )

3. producers to consumers

4. the tapeworm is a parasite

5. they convert energy from the sun (photosynthesis)

6. sunflower-robin (i think im 80% sure)

7. producer

8. consumer

9. prey

10. fresh water snails ( cause the green algea is the producer and the snails are the primary consumers and the small fish consumer so is the big fish)

do yall know the answer?