Why is it unlikely that the frequency of muscular dystrophy in the human population will be reduced quickly by means of natural selection? a) natural selection acts only on homozygous recessive individuals b) muscular dystrophy is not a genetic disorder. c) the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals is too great. d) homozygous dominant individuals can have affected children.

well

explanation:

the correct answer is - d. china has a large and growing population.

the fact that china has a large (the biggest) population, and it is still growing, doesn't hinder the agriculture production in the country. in fact, it can for increased production in the agriculture, since there's more labor force, as well the sheer mass of people produces lots of scientists that come up with new inventions as to how to improve this sector. nice example is the inner mongolia region in china, in general dominated by the gobi desert, but few scientist came up with a nice idea as to how to make the region productive by using plants that are very resistant to droughts, so lots of people have been employed, and the region is becoming greener and greener each year, and the production of food in this region is also increasing.

what are the options? add them, then i will be glad to .