This image shows the relative frequency of banded and non-banded snails in a population. If the frequency of banded snails decreased to 60% and non-banded snails increased to 40%, would you consider the population to be evolving?

The nonbanded are evolving and the banded are not. It looks like something is either eating the banded shrimp and not the unbranded. Or the unbranded shrimp are eating the banded shrimp.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

you can now give him brainliest

Explanation:

its not shrimp, its snails.

the answer is a) a shiprock was formed by igneous process

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."