In areas that are hard hit by natural disasters, many people are unable to purchase property insurance. Defend your stance on providing or not providing insurance in these disaster areas.

I personally used to live in Florida when i was little and I went through one hurricane and it absolutely destroyed our house. Unfortunately we did not have property insurance and we had to pay out of pocket for repairs. I believe everyone should be able to be provided with property insurance in these disaster areas. In the text, It states "Property damage from Hurricane Katrina and costs to rehabilitate or rebuild the area may exceed $100 billion, making it the most costly hurricane in U.S. history." Thats a lot of money to recuperate and still some people hadn't recovered in some areas.

Explanation: I got 100% ur welcome:)

Insurance should be provided for these areas because people are in need. This insurance should be buyable like car or home insurance. If wreckage to these places happens so often I think it would be silly not to have back up in this form. Personally I would just move out of the area and to some place safer.  - 100%

lysosome is this part of the cell is surrounded by a very thick outer membrane to protect the rest of the cell from its strong enzymes.

x would be the most and the least would be y because there are more fruit   and seeds than flock z has insects