subject
Biology, 24.02.2021 22:30 rayne40

I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientists and policy makers often have to work together to set catch limits on fisheries. Imagine that a policy maker proposes to allow the fishing of a cer­tain species to go on at current rates because, she says, “Fishing at current rates will not impact the ecosystem. We are removing fish at a rate lower than the birth rate of their population.” Is this claim valid? What indicators would you look at to support or disprove this claim? Explain your reasoning.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00, Aysha1311
Many farmers prefer cattle without horns because it is safer for their herds. the allele for no horns (n) is dominant to the allele for the presence of horns (n). a farmer mates a male with horns to a heterozygous female without horns. what is the chance that the offspring will have horns?
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 03:30, avree4722
Someone me with this: a mineral' is determined by its actomic structure.
Answers: 2
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 12:00, iisanchez27
This is a scaffolding of protein fibers that us sell keep it shape in a cell division and cell movement
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00, blesskids600
This is an active transport mechanism by which cells pump sodium and potassium ions against the concentration gradient
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientists and policy makers often have to work together to set catch limits...

Questions in other subjects: