WILL GIVE IF CORRECT ASAP!! 1. Which statement is NOT true regarding the above picture?
A. Cave fish live in the dark, and therefore no longer needed the adaptational advantage of needing eyes
B. It is not possible that these two fish came from a common ancestor.
C. Cave fish developed different adaptations from minnows because of their surrounding environment, like sensitivity to vibrations.
D. Minnows would not be well adapted for extremely dark environments.

2. What type of evidence of evolution does the above picture represent, when you notice the presence and lack of eyes in the minnow & cave fish?
A. Eyes must be a Homologous structure
B. Eyes must be an analogous structure
C. Eyes must represent biochemical evidence
D. Eyes must be a vestigial structure

Juan and carol were studying invertebrates in biology. they knew that segmented or earth worms preferred a dark, moist habitat. during this lab, they would be investigating the responses of organisms called planaria or dugesia tigrina. these were simple flatworms that still had a one-way digestive system and a very simple nervous system. juan and carol placed the planaria in a petri dish containing cool, distilled water that was partially covered with black paper. they shined a light on the dish. next, they removed the paper and placed a small amount of chicken liver at one end of the dish. they added a few large salt crystals to the water. finally, they added drops of hot water to the cool water in the petri dish. their results can be seen in the data table. according to their experiment, all but one conclusion is valid.