PLEASE HELP I HAVE 20 MINS LEFT. After performing an investigation, a scientist produced results that did not support the hypothesis. Another scientist does the same experiment and her results do support the hypothesis. What should the scientists' next steps be to make sure any claim made regarding these investigations is valid?
Change the hypothesis to match the results.
Choose data from both investigations that supports the desired outcome.
Publish the results so the public can decide which investigation is correct
Compare and discuss the results with other scientists to determine future research plans,

okay so im not a 100 percent sure but i belive it is compare and disscusse the results with other sintist to determin future reserch plans if it is not that then it is publish the result

Explanation:

The last one.

Explanation:

Not every investigation gets the same results, she cant say the other scientist is wrong, because without comparing results she cant look for stuff that supports ''the desire outcome''  therefore the correct answer is D, she should compare and discuss the results with the other scientist that worked on the same topic, and determine research with both results to explore what's wrong or what's missing. Hope that helps!

it’s lava came from an explosive eruption