An insecticide is a chemical that can rid a plant of insects that cause damage to the plant. If the same insecticide is used for many years, it is likely that it will no longer rid plants of insects. Which statement BEST explains why insects are no longer harmed by an insecticide that has been used on the same plants for many years? (S7L5b) 1 pt. A. Over time, plants sprayed with an insecticide develop a resistance to it, which transfers to the insects when the insects eat the plants. B. Some insects are born with an ability to avoid harm from an insecticide, and they pass this ability to their offspring when they mate and reproduce. C. Some insects are born with an ability to avoid harm from an insecticide, and they pass this ability to other insects by coming into contact with them. D. Over time, plants sprayed with an insecticide develop a resistance to it, which transfers to the insects when the insects lay their eggs on the plants.

answer; //the above statement is (false);

you are certainly talking about this picture:

a: is the label of the white square, it is showing the  replication fork, formed by helicase (d) ==> so it is the site of dna separation and replication 

b: is a new dna brand that is following directly the replication fork, so it is continuous ==> built continuously from 5' to 3

c: dna polymerase cannot replicate dna on its own, it needs the of their proteins, and one of them plays the role of a clamp which fixes  the dna with the dna template and increases  the processivity of the enzyme. ==>   stops polymerase from falling off the  template.

d: is the enzyme responsible for forming the replication fork (helicase) ==> unwinds and separates dna into two strands

e: is the delayed strand, it is built  in the opposite sense of the helicase, so dna will be built in fragments ==> built  fragments from 5' to 3 joins

and finally f: is the enzyme that builds  the new dna strand (dna polymerase) ==>   adds nucleotides to make a new dna helix.

credit: gradman555p98x9p

read more on -