Worldwide, about twice as many people eat a plant-based diet as eat a meat-based diet. A plant-based diet requires fewer resources to produce. It takes 28 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce 1 calorie of protein from meat. In contrast, it takes only 3.3 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce 1 calorie of protein from grain. With the population continuing to increase, some people believe it may be necessary to give up meat-based diets to ensure that there are enough resources to produce food for all people. Do you think that a plant-based or a meat-based diet is more nutritious, or are they both equally nutritious? Why does a plant-based diet require fewer resources to produce? Do you think people should eat less meat? Why or why not?

there are so many examples for that in different areas, like biology experiment carried out in our lab recently.

here's one link:

events in order:

1.       vishnu schist

2. zoroaster granite

3. bass limestone

4. hakatar   shale

5. igneous intrusion

6. shinumo quartzite

7. dox sandstone

8. tapeats limestone

9. bright angel shale

10. muav limestone

11. temple butte limestone

12. redwall limestone  

nonconformity

answer: the unkar group shows angular unconformity because the layers are turned at angle.

unconformity

answer: specifically the angular unconformity occurs between the cambrian and precambrian rocks. the dox sandstone, shinumo quartzite, hakatar shale, and bass limestone have been filled. an angular unconformity occurs between the cambrian and precambrian rocks. the dox sandstone, shinumo quartzite, hakatar shale, and bass limestone have been filled.

disconformity

answer: the disconformities aremarked irregular lines between the sedimentaryrocks layers.