Human activities can have an impact on natural disasters. t or f

True

Explanation:

Take Hurricanes for example, As global warming keeps getting worse, We are going to keep having more and more since the ocean will stay warmer longer which is showing right as this moment. Earthquakes, Humans can interfere with this say they are mining near tectonic plates and they have an explosion occur, This can cause a major or minor earthquake to occur as the plates shift among one another which can cause violent shaking and maybe even huge faults to occur in the earth's surface

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

cellular respiration oxidizes food into energy in the form of atps.

glycolysis (6 c hexose) > 2x atps are used > 6c hexose biphosphate > 2 x 3c triphosphate >

2 x 3c pyruvate (2x nadh produced from nad) and (4x atp produced)

pyruvate actively pumped mitochondrial matrix.